Thursday, May 8, 2025
Home Blog Page 19

Mexico should seek strategic alliance with Canada in renegotiation of USMCA: UNAM rector

Mexico should seek strategic alliance with Canada in renegotiation of USMCA: UNAM rector
UNAM rector Leonardo Lomelí Vanegas said that in the renegotiation of the USMCA, a strategic alliance with Canada must be sought.

 

After stating that a narrative about the USMCA prevails in Washington that does not correspond to reality, the rector of UNAM, Leonardo Lomelí Vanegas, pointed out that in the renegotiation of the trade agreement, Mexico must seek a strategic alliance with Canada.

When giving the inaugural lecture, “The Strategic Integration of North America,” he explained that, with the arrival of Donald Trump to the White House, Canada proposed negotiating its trade agreement independently with the United States, but today the prevailing view is that Mexico and Canada should unite in this renegotiation and together face this challenge.

The Rector considered that the protectionist measures of the United States, "beyond the rhetoric, will be something temporary", since the long-term trend is the strengthening of the economic integration of North America.

“Not doing so would mean losing more competitiveness in an increasingly globalized world and putting the region at a disadvantage, notably compared to other emerging economies and to China. I believe that it is counterproductive to the United States' own interests to 'mutilate' this relationship and not bet on greater integration of North America,” said Lomelí Vanegas. 

In the conference that is part of the Colloquium “The Other Side: New Perspectives on the Mexico-United States Relationship”, Lomelí Vanegas highlighted that the economies of the three countries represent around 29 percent of the world's gross domestic product (GDP); and between 2003 and 2024 their trade went from 632 billion dollars to more than 1.6 trillion dollars annually, with an average growth of 5 percent per year.

In addition, he said, 56.5 million jobs are generated in the region. Of these, 36 million are concentrated in the United States; six million in Canada; and 14.5 million in Mexico come from sectors linked to trade, which represent 24 percent of total employment.

At the meeting organized by UNAM – through the Center for Research on North America –, El Colegio Nacional and the newspaper El Universal, the Rector explained that the region is home to 6 percent of the world's population (513 million inhabitants) and its economic weight (24 billion dollars) is greater than that of the European Union (16.6 billion dollars). In other words, it is only surpassed by the Regional Comprehensive Economic Association, made up of 15 countries in the Asia-Pacific region.

At the Jorge Carpizo Auditorium of the Humanities Coordination, he insisted that there is a promising future for relations between Mexico and the United States for economic integration and greater academic relations.

“If we look at the region's potential in the long term, we will come to the conclusion that it would be very costly for the United States to ignore the importance of the relationship with Mexico, the economic and commercial relationship. We believe that in the long term this integration will deepen and that the renegotiation of the Treaty (T-MEC) can be an opportunity to advance regional integration,” he reiterated.

Lomelí also said that strategic alliances should be established to strengthen infrastructure, employment and supply chains. In addition, relocation or nearshoring could be used as a strategy to strengthen regional manufacturing, foster academic alliances and promote talent development, among other aspects.

On her occasion, the current president of El Colegio Nacional, Susana Lizano Soberón, stressed that relations between both nations have gone through complex periods, marked by challenging political and socioeconomic situations. However, in most cases there are also efforts at cooperation that have led to beneficial solutions for both countries.

“At El Colegio Nacional we are convinced that the parallel history between our country and the United States has enriched both nations; in particular, in scientific, academic, cultural and artistic collaboration,” he said, adding that the joint work of universities and public and private institutions on multiple projects has benefited scientific, technological and cultural development.

CISAN Director Graciela Martínez-Zalce said that it was a day of sensible reflection on the region, in which one could look beyond Google maps, executive orders, explosive messages on social media and anti-immigrant and “nativist” rhetoric.

Meanwhile, David Aponte, editorial director of El Universal, stressed the importance of, in times of post-truth, digital oligarchy, authoritarian temptations and the lack of balance of power, the academy and journalism coming together to listen, understand and inform better. 

You may be interested in: US tariffs on Mexico paused; working groups to be set up on security and trade

Pro-immigrant protests in the US prompted a halt to tariffs

Pro-immigrant demonstrations
Pro-immigrant protests are joining forces to stop President Donald Trump's impositions, including tariffs.

US President Donald Trump has made changes to immigration matters, which has led to mass deportations, which has also resulted in the imposition of tariffs, actions that affect the US community, which is why they have taken to the streets in different parts of the country to protest against these actions.

These samples are added to the actions that have been carried out against Donald Trump's impositions, including the issue of tariffs, mentioned journalist Manuel Ortiz during the program Peninsula 360, in Hecho en California with Marcos Gutierrez. 

“The participation of young people at this time is very important and is related to the issue of tariffs, because it is clear that it is not the only cause; however, the massive protests that have been taking place and the participation of young people have had an effect on the decision to extend the deadline for the imposition of tariffs by one month,” said Ortiz. 

Donald Trump imposed a 25 percent tariff on Mexico on February 1. By the third day, the Mexican president and the Trump administration reached an agreement to pause the imposition for a month and established a working group on trade and security, committing to reinforce the northern border with 10,000 members of the National Guard to prevent drug and arms trafficking. This working group began to mobilize today, February 4.

During the radio program, Gerardo Ortiz spoke about the demonstration and the movement that was generated this Monday, February 3, with the call for “A day without immigrants,” a call that was mobilized through social networks, asking that they carry out activities for one day in their jobs, schools, businesses and all unnecessary activities, this in order to generate an economic impact in the country.

During his participation in the movement, Gerardo Ortiz noticed the absence of people in the streets, as well as Latino businesses closed in support of the day without immigrants; in addition to this, a group of people took to the streets to demand their rights.

For his part, the announcer Marcos Guitierrez recognized the participation of the young people who are more involved, as they go out into the streets to give a voice to those who do not have one, representing parents, women, children and adults. 

Finally, an isolated case was mentioned, as during a demonstration an American flag was burned in protest, however, during the broadcast a call was made not to take these actions, to demonstrate with respect and responsibility above all.

 

You may be interested in: Local leaders speak out against deportations and reaffirm sanctuary cities policy

Transfer of detained immigrants in the US to Guantanamo Bay begins

Transfer of detained immigrants in the US to Guantanamo Bay begins
The White House has confirmed that the first flights of immigrants detained in the US to Guantanamo Bay began today. Photo: Wikipedia

The White House has confirmed that the first flights to Guantanamo Bay with immigrants detained in the United States began today, as part of President Donald Trump's plan to remove as many people from this community as possible from the country.

“I can confirm that today the first U.S. flights to Guantanamo Bay carrying illegal migrants are underway,” White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said.

In an interview with Fox Business, the Press Secretary explained that the United States is not a “dumping ground for criminals” and that other countries agree to collaborate with the United States to receive not only its deported citizens, but also those from other nations.

“President Trump is not joking and will no longer allow the United States to be a “dumping ground” for illegal criminals from countries around the world. Thus, El Salvador has not only agreed to the repatriation of its own citizens, but also illegal criminals from other countries who will then be sent to its prisons,” Leavitt said.

He said that South American nations are joining the Central American country.

“Venezuela has also agreed to repatriation flights, and Colombia has also agreed to cooperate with the repatriation of illegal Colombian citizens that we have found inside our country,” he said.

In January, President Trump issued an executive order calling for the maximum expansion of a migrant detention facility at Guantanamo, saying it could hold up to 30,000 people.

It should be noted that no precise data has been given on how many migrants there are on these first flights, nor any details about these people, including whether any of the migrants have criminal records.

You may be interested in: Trump administration sets “minimum quotas” for arrests and deportations for ICE agents

Only two sexes: a risk for the LGBTIQ+ community in the United States

The LGBTIQ+ community in the United States
The LGBTIQ community in the United States is in danger, not only because of the measures and changes brought about by President Donald Trump, but also because of the hate crimes, mental disorders and discrimination they face.

For many years, civil associations, activists and people in general have fought for the rights of the LGBTIQ+ community, achieving progress in freedom of expression and its guarantees in the United States; but with the arrival of Donald Trump as president, an increase in hate crimes, as well as mental disorders and discrimination is expected.

“From today on, it will be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders: male and female,” Trump said during his inaugural address.

Titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” the order says that “the sexes are not changeable, and are based on fundamental and incontrovertible reality.”

The president’s executive order has profound and adverse impacts on the nation’s more than 1.6 million transgender people, essentially erasing the existence of transgender people in legal, healthcare, and educational settings. The move comes amid a rise in hate crimes against LGBTIQ+ people.

During a briefing held by Ethnic Media ServicesJordan Willow Evans, executive director of the Outsider Media Foundation, expressed her uncertainty about the upcoming changes to the rights of this community, assuring that they should not fear or stop the fight, on the contrary, it is necessary to be strong and firm, now more than ever. 

For his part, Ilan H. Meyer, PhD in Philosophy at the Williams Institute, stated that it is estimated that there are around 6 million people over 13 years of age who identify as transgender and 1.2 million adults who identify as non-binary and 5 million as intersex, so a large part of the community is affected. 

Meyer commented that anti-transgender rhetoric will basically generate acts of hate against the LGBTIQ+ community. 

“The rhetoric that we are seeing now, which we are witnessing and which has a very strong implication that incites violence, where the analysis shows that there is a fivefold increase in attacks against transgender people and this increases even more with black and Hispanic people,” said the professor. 

Bamby Salcedo, president and CEO of the TransLatina Coalition, commented that his organization provides policy, research, culture, and narrative services for the LGBTQI+ community, which is why they have found that over the years there have been attempts to eliminate this sector of the population. It is not something new, but rather a constant struggle over time and it will have to be faced again.

Gael Mateo Jerez-Urquia, from Project TRANS Services Navigator in San Diego, said that due to Donald Trump's speech, there has been an increase in mental disorders, self-harm and hate crimes, in addition to dealing with between 4 to 6 gender changes a week, while calls to the emergency line due to fear and uncertainty have skyrocketed.

Sailor Jones, associate director of Common Cause of North Carolina, said that the federal government is trying to erase the existence of transgender people, but not only that, as she expressed her anger at the mass deportations that are taking place among immigrant friends and neighbors in order to create fear and make their voices smaller in the communities.

She also commented that, in terms of medical services, there is an impact, since any gender surgery or service in this regard is not available, so any effort that tries to impact medical services will end up affecting everyone at some point. 

Experts agree that President Donald Trump's rhetoric has created discrimination between communities, but it also puts people's well-being at risk, as medical services are reduced, as are opportunities, which can lead to suicide or mental illness.

 

You may be interested in: California must lead resistance to President Donald Trump's rhetoric: ACLU

Sandbags and supplies available at Bay Area locations in anticipation of storms

Sandbags and supplies available in Bay Area for storms
Doran Goodwin (left) and Curt Siglock (right) fill sandbags at the Stockton Soccer Complex in Stockton, California, on Jan. 26, 2024. (Harika Maddala/Bay City News)

By Thomas Hughes. Bay City News.

Sandbags and supplies are available in the Bay Area to help residents prepare for expected heavy rains that prompted a National Weather Service flood watch from Monday through Wednesday morning.

The storm is forecast to bring several inches of rain to the Bay Area, including 3 to 6 inches in the North Bay between Monday and Friday. Up to 8 inches could fall at higher elevations, and runoff could cause flooding in lower elevations.

Marin, Sonoma, Solano, San Mateo, Alameda and Santa Clara counties have made sandbags available at various collection points. Some locations are restricted to residents of unincorporated areas of those counties, including all towns in Alameda County.

In Marin County, all sites are self-serve and supplies are available on-site. Many sites are at fire stations, schools, parks and recreation areas, as well as the San Rafael Civic Center.

A helpful tip for filling your own Marin County sandbags is to use a traffic cone as a funnel, which is available along with other supplies at county gas stations.

A complete list of Marin County sandbag locations is available at emergency.marincounty.gov/pages/sandbags.

Sonoma County has sandbag stations open at the Sonoma County Fire District Station at 6554 Mirabel Road in Forestville, the Geyserville Fire District Station at 6571 Highway 128 in Healdsburg, the Rancho Adobe Fire Station at 99 Liberty Rd. in Petaluma, and the City of Sonoma at Larson Park.

All locations are self-serve. For more information on Sonoma County storm preparedness, visit socoemergency.org/emergency/flooding/sandbags/.

Alameda County pickups are limited to residents of unincorporated areas of the county. Supplies were available at the county public works building at 951 Turner Court in Hayward, but availability of supplies at other locations could not be confirmed Monday.

A list of sandbag locations in Alameda County is available at

acpwa.org/prepare-for-winter-storms.page. There is a limit of two bags per person.

Residents in unincorporated areas of San Mateo County can make a reservation to pick up up to 15 prefabricated sandbags at the Public Works Department's Grant Corporation Yard, located at 752 Chestnut Street in Redwood City.

Supplies are also available at that location for residents who do not live in unincorporated areas, along with supplies at Pescadero High School and the Public Works Department's La Honda Corporation Yard, located at 59 Entrada Way in La Honda.

For more information and to reserve sandbags, visit smcgov.org/publicworks/sandbags.

Santa Clara County residents can find several locations that have pre-filled sandbags and self-serve stations. Pre-filled sites include behind George Mayne Elementary School in San Jose, the Palo Alto Air Terminal, the El Toro Fire Station in Morgan Hill, Kelley Park in San Jose, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District warehouse at 5905 Winfield Blvd in San Jose.

A complete list of locations in Santa Clara County is available at valleywater.org/flooding-safety/flood-ready/sandbags.

Solano County residents can visit solanocounty.com/depts/oes/grs/storm_ready/sandbag_information.asp for a complete list of sandbag locations.

Self-service stations are available at several locations, including several police and fire stations and public works properties.

You may be interested in: Rebuilding Los Angeles is not possible without the immigrant community, experts say

Mexico Launches Northern Border Operation with 10,000 National Guard Troops

Mexico Launches Northern Border Operation with 10,000 National Guard Troops
The Northern Border Operation has begun. 10,000 National Guard (GN) and Army troops have been deployed to reinforce security on the country's northern border. Photo: Government of Mexico

Since 6:00 AM on Tuesday, February 4, the Mexican government has initiated the Northern Border Operation, deploying 10,000 members of the National Guard (GN) and the Army to reinforce security along the country's northern border.

This action is by the agreements made on Monday, February 3, between the Mexican and U.S. governments on security and trade issues, following a phone call between the presidents of both countries, during which it was also agreed to suspend the imposition of tariffs by the United States for one month.

In this regard, the Secretary of Defense prepared for the deployment of 10,000 National Guard and Army personnel. At 3:00 PM on February 3, a C-130 Hercules plane and a C-27J Spartan from the Mexican Air Force took off from the "Felipe Ángeles" International Airport heading to Campeche, while two Boeing 727 aircraft from the National Guard departed from Mexico City’s Benito Juárez International Airport, destined for Mérida, Yucatán, and Cancún, Quintana Roo, respectively.

According to the Mexican government, the purpose of these flights was to transport 990 National Guard agents, starting at 6:00 AM on February 4 (Central Mexico time), to the cities of Tijuana, Baja California; Sonoyta, Sonora; and Matamoros, Tamaulipas.

The purpose of these flights is to transport 990 National Guard agents to the cities of Tijuana, Baja California; Sonoyta, Sonora and Matamoros, Tamaulipas. Photo: Government of Mexico

Additionally, on Tuesday, the National Guard deployed 6,310 agents from various state coordinations across the country, who are traveling by land to the cities of Tijuana, Tecate, and Mexicali in Baja California; Agua Prieta and Sonoyta in Sonora; Piedras Negras and Ciudad Acuña in Coahuila; Ojinaga, Puerto Palomas, and Ciudad Juárez in Chihuahua; Colombia in Nuevo León; and Playa Bagdad and Ciudad Mier in Tamaulipas.

Mexican authorities emphasized that, at the No. 1-A Military Field in Mexico City, 2,700 members of military units from Hidalgo, Tlaxcala, State of Mexico, Puebla, and Veracruz gathered, leaving by land starting at 6:00 AM on February 4, destined for Tijuana, Tecate, and Mexicali in Baja California; San Luis Río Colorado and Nogales in Sonora; Ciudad Juárez in Chihuahua; Nuevo Laredo, Reynosa, and Matamoros in Tamaulipas.

These elements, the authorities said, will reinforce the troops already deployed on the border, with the aim of stopping the flow of fentanyl, other drugs and illegal immigration to the United States. Photo: Government of Mexico

These personnel, the authorities specified, will reinforce the troops already deployed along the border, to halt the flow of fentanyl, other drugs, and illegal immigration to the United States. They will also aim to prevent the introduction of weapons from the United States, always with strict adherence to human rights.

You may be interested in: Trump becomes the president with the worst approval rating at the start of his term

US tariffs on Mexico paused; working groups to be set up on security and trade

US tariffs on Mexico paused; working groups to be set up on security and trade
During the morning conference this Monday, February 3, the president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum, reported that in her conversation with the president of the United States, Donald Trump, it was agreed to pause the US tariffs on Mexico.. Photo: Gabriel Monroy /Presidency

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said that during her conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump, they agreed to pause the imposition of 25 percent tariffs for one month and to establish a working group on trade and security. 

This was announced during his morning press conference on Monday, February 3, where he specified that it was also agreed to reinforce the northern border with 10 thousand elements of the National Guard (GN) to prevent drug trafficking, in particular, fentanyl, and, for the first time, the United States will work together to prevent arms trafficking into Mexican territory.

“I told him: 'Well, we're going to put it on hold for a month. And I'm sure that, in this month, we're going to be able to deliver results, good results for your people, good results for the people of Mexico.' And this was the result of the agreement. So, it was a good conversation within the framework of respect,” she detailed at the press conference.

The head of the Federal Executive specified that the call between the two leaders took place this Monday, at 8:00 a.m., lasting about three quarters of an hour, and in which she explained the seriousness of the quantity of high-powered weapons entering Mexico from the United States.

“And these high-powered weapons that arrive illegally, arm criminal groups and give them firepower. And we asked him to also help the United States to prevent arms trafficking from the United States to Mexico. He agreed,” he added.

He said that after the call, he spoke with the Secretary of National Defense, General Ricardo Trevilla Trejo, to work based on the agreement that was reached with the American president.

"It also helps us to strengthen security on the northern border. I think it was a good agreement and we will be reporting on this month of work by the security teams and the trade teams," he said.

"It is about collaborating as we have always said, coordinating, without losing sovereignty, with respect for our territories and our sphere of action. And he agreed that we should set up this working group to make an action plan, within the framework of our sovereignties, that would yield results," he stressed.

Sheinbaum stressed that during the call she explained that there is no trade deficit between Mexico and the United States, but rather that both nations are trading partners, which is the best way to face the competitiveness of other regions of the world.

Regarding migration, he stressed that there is already a High Level working group in which the Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Juan Ramón de la Fuente, participates and in which work is being done especially on defending the human rights of Mexicans on the other side of the border.

She shared that she will send President Donald Trump the campaign Stay away from drugs. Fentanyl kills you, which aims to prevent young people in our country from consuming this drug.

“For humanitarian reasons, we have to help the United States avoid this crisis of fentanyl consumption that they have, which is leading to overdose deaths,” he said.

He also acknowledged that the agreement is the result of the work of the Mexican Government Cabinet, which, he said, is a great team.

“The team is with me because this is really a task of the Cabinet, of the whole team, of Security, of Economy, of Finance, of the Interior, of everyone. We are a great team, the truth is that I am, I feel not only supported, but that we have really managed to build a great team in the Cabinet,” she commented.

You may be interested in: Trump becomes the president with the worst approval rating at the start of his term

It's a fact! Donald Trump imposes tariffs of 25% on Mexico and Canada; Americans are the most affected

Tariff rate of 25% to Mexico
The tariff rate of 25% for Mexico is a fact, all products entering the United States from Mexico and Canada will have a tariff rate of 25 percent, while for those arriving from China it will be 10 percent, the White House reported.

 

Starting this Saturday, February 1, all products entering the United States from Mexico and Canada will have a tariff rate of 25 percent, while for those arriving from China it will be 10 percent, the White House reported in a statement, thus fulfilling the threats announced by Donald Trump since his presidential campaign.

The announcement was followed by a message from President Trump on the social network Truth Social, where he stated that he had taken the measure in response to the “great threat” posed by immigration and the entry of drugs into the country.

“Today I implemented a 25% tariff on imports from Mexico and Canada (10% on Canadian energy) and an additional 10% tariff on China. This was done through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) because of the great threat posed by illegal immigrants and the lethal drugs that kill our citizens, including fentanyl,” Trump wrote.

“We need to protect the American people, and it is my duty as president to ensure everyone’s safety. I made a promise during my campaign to stop the flood of illegal immigrants and drugs crossing our borders, and Americans voted overwhelmingly to do so,” he concluded.

tariff rate of 25%

The fact sheet issued by the White House states that the imposition of tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico and China seeks to address “the extraordinary threat posed by illegal aliens and drugs, including deadly fentanyl, which constitute a national emergency under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).”

The document explains that tariffs will be reduced until “the crisis is alleviated.”

The flow of smuggled drugs such as fentanyl into the United States through illicit distribution networks has created a national emergency, including a public health crisis, he said.

The report said Chinese officials have not taken the necessary measures to stop the flow of chemical precursors to known criminal cartels and to stop money laundering by transnational criminal organisations.

He added that Mexican drug trafficking organizations have an “intolerable alliance with the Mexican government,” while it has offered refuge to cartels to dedicate themselves to the manufacture and transportation of dangerous narcotics.

"This alliance endangers the national security of the United States, and we must eradicate the influence of these dangerous cartels," the text stresses.

Likewise, it highlights that there is also a growing presence of Mexican cartels operating fentanyl and nitazene synthesis laboratories in Canada, and that a recent study recognized the increased national production of this synthetic opioid and its growing footprint within the international distribution of narcotics.

“Previous administrations failed to take full advantage of America’s economic position as a tool to secure our borders against illegal migration and combat the scourge of fentanyl, preferring instead to let problems fester. Access to the U.S. market is a privilege. The United States has one of the most open economies in the world and the lowest average tariffs in the world,” he said.

In light of these facts, the economist, columnist, communicator, American politician and professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, Robert Reich, has pointed out on multiple occasions the damage that these tariffs will do to American society, especially to the working class and the most vulnerable.

“Tariffs are not paid by other countries. In the end, we pay them at the cash register. And they are regressive: they take a larger percentage of workers' salaries than those of the rich,” said the writer.

Reich further explained that a recent analysis found that when Trump imposed tariffs during his first term, companies that contributed to Republicans were more likely to get tariff exemptions. “Trump’s corporate donors will not bear the cost of his trade wars. It’s crony capitalism at its worst.”

In a video made just four months ago by Reich, the economics expert details that Trump seems genuinely confused about what tariffs are and who pays for them.

“Tariffs are not paid by other countries, they are paid by the American importer at the cost, which is usually passed on to American consumers. The tariff is a sales tax. Now, specific tariffs on specific products can give products made in the United States an advantage over imports, but there is no strategy behind the wave of tariffs,” he said.

The tariffs, he noted, would cost the average family an estimated $2,500 more per year. “This is a regressive tax that takes a larger share of the wages of the working class and the poor than it does of the incomes of the rich,” he said.

And it is American companies that pay the costs, by paying the tariffs imposed on the goods they buy in those markets, which could be devastating for Americans.

Trump called “tariff” “the most beautiful word in the dictionary” during the election campaign, repeatedly saying that imposing high tariffs on foreign goods would boost the U.S. economy, a claim that many economists question.

“The economic consequences of such tariffs would be severe for North America and could cause significant disruptions to growth and trade relations,” said Julian Hinz, director of trade policy research at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

The Peterson Institute for International Economics said the 25 percent tariffs on Canadian and Mexican products would hurt all three North American countries and, over time, cause some prices to rise in the United States.

On Friday morning, Mexican Economy Secretary Marcelo Ebrard reported that the imposition of a 25 percent tariff on Mexican exports would seriously affect consumers through higher prices, reduced product availability and possible disruptions in supply chains.

These effects would mainly affect products such as automobiles; Mexico is the main supplier of automobiles and auto parts to the United States, and the tariffs would harm 12 million families and cause strong inflationary pressures.

Likewise, computers; the impact of tariffs on Mexican computers would affect 40 million families in the United States, since Mexico is the fifth largest supplier of this device in the country.

Also, in the case of televisions, in the United States, 1 in 2 screens is of Mexican origin, and the increase in tariffs would affect 32 million families.

In the case of refrigerators, 1 in 3 purchased in the United States comes from Mexico, so 5 million families would be affected by this measure, which would represent an additional outlay of 817 million dollars.

In addition, these tariffs will also affect the pockets of American families with an increase in the price of products such as: fruits, vegetables, meat and beer.

The greatest impact will be in the country's border states, where consumption of Mexican products is highest.

 

You may be interested in: API leaders in Atlanta stand with Latino community after ICE raids

Trump becomes the president with the worst approval rating at the start of his term

Trump the president with the worst approval rating
Trump is the president with the worst approval rating at the beginning of his term, with only 47 percent approval as he enters his second term, making him the most unpopular US president in the country's history.

The Washington DC-based consulting firm Gallup, famous for its public opinion polls around the world, reported that the new president of the United States, Donald Trump, barely has a 47 percent approval rating as he enters his second term, making him the most unpopular American president in the country's history.

“At 47 percent, President Donald Trump’s initial job approval rating for his second term is similar to the 45 percent he earned during his first term, again putting him below every other president-elect since 1953,” the pollster said in a statement.

And, he added, “Trump remains the only president-elect with initial approval ratings below 50 percent, and his latest disapproval rating (48 percent) is three percentage points higher than in 2017.”

The highest-ranked candidate so far, according to Gallup, remains Democrat John F. Kennedy, who, in the first month of his presidency in 1961, had a 72 percent approval rating and just 6 percent disapproval rating.

Kennedy is followed by Dwight Eisenhower (1953) and Barack Obama (2009), both with an approval rating of 68 percent, while third place is occupied by Jimmy Carter with 66 percent.

While it is true that other polls put Trump in a better position in terms of American liking, they do not radically change the figures. CNN poll says 56 percent of adult citizens expect Donald to be a very good or fairly good president, while 43 percent expect him to be a fairly bad or very bad president.

Polls conducted before Trump was sworn in as president barely gave him 50 percent of voter approval, such as the one conducted by Fox News, while that of the Wall Street Journal found that 47 percent of registered voters viewed him favorably, while 51 percent viewed him unfavorably.

You may be interested in: API leaders in Atlanta stand with Latino community after ICE raids

A day without immigrants sparks opinions on social media

A day without immigrants
A day without immigrants is an initiative that has emerged through social networks. The call is for Monday, February 3, 2025. All migrants are invited to stop working, miss work, school, not shop, or use media and services, in order to generate an economic impact.

An initiative to carry out a national strike of the immigrant community in the United States, “A day without immigrants”, is circulating on social media. It seeks to demonstrate the importance of this sector in the country's economy. However, opinions for and against are present. 

The call is for Monday, February 3, 2025, and all migrants are invited to suspend their work, miss work, school, not shop, or use media and services, in order to generate an economic impact with million-dollar losses. However, controversy has arisen among users, as many do not agree with this movement.

A day without immigrants

According to the Center for Migration Studies, there were 11.7 million undocumented immigrants in the United States in July 2023, a figure that changed for 2024, since the Department of Homeland Security, In April 2024, the US published a report indicating that by early 2022 there were some 11 million undocumented immigrants in the country.

In 2022, undocumented immigrants paid $1.496 billion in federal, state, and local taxes, the majority of that amount, $1.459 billion, was paid to the federal government, while the remaining $1.437 billion was paid to state and local governments, this According to the Institute for Fiscal and Economic Policy (ITEP),

The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy's report shows that undocumented immigrants pay about $$8,889 per person in federal, state, and local taxes in 2022, showing that for every million undocumented immigrants residing in the country, public services receive $$8.9 billion in additional tax revenue.

The immigrant community is part of the country's economy, and its importance has been demonstrated in various reports, however, different users have shown apathy towards the initiative of "A day without immigrants." 

For some, one day is too little, so they suggest a week or two, however another sector of Internet users considers that it would put their well-being and safety at risk, as they fear losing their jobs or putting themselves in a vulnerable position. 

A day without immigrants

On the other hand, there are those who support and join, with the commitment to demonstrate the importance of migrants for the United States: “Yes! If we all do it, it will have a great impact! I'm in!” reads one comment on Instagram. 

A day without immigrants

Although support and unity are requested, other users have shown themselves to be against the national strike, as they consider their work, paying their rent and avoiding problems to be more important, or they simply show themselves to be against immigrants.

A day without immigrants

There are endless comments on social media, but it remains to be seen what action the immigrant community will take. If they actually suspend their activities, how many will do so, what impact it will have, and the number of participants. This will determine citizen unity and participation, including for the next calls to action against the measures taken by President Donald Trump.

 

You may be interested in: Local leaders speak out against deportations and reaffirm sanctuary cities policy

es_MX